A Review of the Literature Abstract This review of literature examines and attempts to explain the following: The definition of contemporary families including the common stereotypes known as modern and traditional.
Another factor which has been involved in those changes is the growing intervention of the state, by legislative action, in the domestic affairs of the family. Although traditional and modern families share similarities in terms of constitutional concept and milieu of love and care, they have several differences in term of family size and gender roles.
Traditional and modern families share similarities in terms of constitutional concept. As the traditional family was, modern family is still on institutional component of western societies.
As an institution, traditional and modern families similarly have to complete functions such as rocreation and socialization of children.
For example, even though the modern family has decreased in size, it is still the common environment where children are born; receive a moral education, where their tendencies are disciplined and where their aspirations are encouraged. Therefore, to reassure the pessimist sociologist of the early twentieth century, family evolution has not lead to desinstitutionalization.
Further, traditional families have an advantage that the families stay close together with a strong bond. (Kong) On the other side, living together can cause number of disputes and disagreements as well; larger the family, more the ways of thinking and more conflict of ideas. Compare and contrast traditional families with modern families Family patterns are changing dramatically because of the demand of modern life. This essay will examine the similarities and differences between traditional families with modern families. The Evolution of Families and Marriages——3 by suggesting that marriages should be entered into by mutual consent and that women were partners in marriage rather than a form of property.
Another similarity between traditional and modern families is that both are a favourable milieu for love and care. As it was in the traditional family there is in the odern family a formidable tie between husband and wife, which springs from an elective affinity and symbolises love.
In the warmness of the family this love spreads amid the children who tend to experience it in their adult life. In addition, in the traditional families the mother usually bore the sole responsibility of the child caring.
Modern parents now share this responsibility together because of social and work constraints. However, holidays which are not common in the traditional family, allow them to spend quality time with their children. Moreover in many modern families he father becomes a house worker, to provide for the needs of his children.
As the statistics shown in the United Kingdom infathers were stay home husbands. All in all, the emphasis on nurturing children can be seen in traditional and modern families, alike. Apart from the similarities mentioned above, traditional and modern families have several differences in the areas of family size and gender roles.
One major difference between the traditional and modern family is the decrease in family size. The traditional family tends to be extended with three or ore generations in the same household because it provides a strong union between its members. Another reason for a large household is that usually farming was the principal economic activity of the family parents and dependants children.
Unlike the traditional family the modern family lives in small houses due to the fact that big houses are expensive and also because modern families usually live in cities. In addition the modern mothers use contraceptive medicine to reduce the chance to have babies whereas traditional mothers did not use birth control.
Statistics from the National Office show that the verage number of children by women born in decreased from 2. To sum up, the migration of the family to the cities, financial constraint and birth control contributed to the decrease in family seize.
Another difference is the shift which occurred in the role of male and female within the transition from traditional to modern family. In the traditional family the male was dominant; he was the breadwinner, the sole financial provider to the family.
In part related to this, the women were dependant on her husband. In fact, she had to obey not only her husband but also the other males living in the household.But that basic concept has taken many forms across different cultures and eras. "Whenever people talk about traditional marriage or traditional families, historians throw up their hands," said.
The Evolution of Families and Marriages——3 by suggesting that marriages should be entered into by mutual consent and that women were partners in marriage rather than a form of property.
The concept of marriage has evolved throughout history. Until the Victorian era, marriage was merely a social contract and in most cases did not involve love between spouses. Other socio-economical motivations fueled loveless marriages between strangers who only shared a .
However, homosexual couples are seen as taboo by society, and some states do not recognize these couples (Fagan, ). How can we judge these couples, however, if we are not creating the conditions where a “traditional” family would thrive (Bengtson, )?
In the past, families collectively took care of themselves. Further, traditional families have an advantage that the families stay close together with a strong bond. (Kong) On the other side, living together can cause number of disputes and disagreements as well; larger the family, more the ways of thinking and more conflict of ideas.
Compare and Contrast the Traditional Roles of Managers Presented by Fayol’s Early Writings with More Contemporary Research of Stewart and Mintzberg. Words | 8 Pages. Compare and contrast the traditional roles of managers presented by Fayol’s early writings with more contemporary research of Stewart and Mintzberg.