Notes on dispensationalism

But before we take a look at the word itself, there is something that we must first understand. Recognizing Differences God never changes. He is always the same.

Notes on dispensationalism

In that work, Ryrie seeks to lay out a thorough explanation of the theological framework known as dispensationalism. Ryrie notes in the opening chapter that dispensationalism as a system has been often misunderstood and misrepresented by those who oppose it pg.

Ryrie then delineates several ways in which dispensationalism is helpful in providing biblical distinctions, offering a coherent philosophy of history, and employing a consistent interpretive hermeneutic. In the next chapter, Ryrie offers a helpful examination of the classic definition of a dispensation from Scofield, and offers his own definition of what exactly a dispensation is: Ryrie makes a crucial clarification that the essence of dispensationalism is not in the belief in dispensations, the number of dispensations, or a premillennial eschatology Ryrie includes three characteristics without which Ryrie says dispensationalism is no longer dispensationalism: In the third chapter, Ryrie explains the elements of a Biblical dispensation.

He then gives an overview of the dispensations according to his understanding, which include the dispensations of Innocency, Conscience, Civil Government, Promise or Patriarchal RuleMosaic Law, Grace, and the Millennium. Ryrie then gives a helpfully clarifying discussion of the consistent hermeneutic employed by dispensationalism, which is one of the key characteristics noted by Ryrie as a sine qua non.

Ryrie explains that this does not imply literalistic interpretations of symbols and figures of speech. He also weighs the hermeneutical approach of traditional, progressive, and non-dispensational theologians, giving explanations of each. Ryrie explains that this charge is due to the misconceptions of anti-dispensationalists.

In fact, Ryrie points out that many non-dispensationalists themselves can at times give the impression that there has been more than one way of salvation.

The next two chapters deal with ecclesiology and eschatology respectively. In chapter nine, Ryrie gives one of the most comprehensive rebuttals of Progressive Dispensationalism to come from a traditional dispensationalist.

Ryrie implies that Progressive Dispensationalism is inherently unstable, and that it will inevitably merge into covenant premillennialism. Ryrie gives a substantive overview of covenant theology in chapter ten, while chapter eleven focuses upon ultra-dispensationalism.

In the final chapter, Ryrie gives an honest plea for integrity in scholarship and for the fair representation of opposing views.

Response Overall, I believe this book is very well done, and worth reading. If anyone wishes to understand Revised, or Traditional, Dispensationalism, this may be the best book to reference.

I especially thought that Ryrie interacted surprisingly well with Progressive Dispensationalism. While I did not finally agree with every one of his critiques, for the most part I found him to be fair, while also deftly pointing out hermeneutical and systemic flaws within Progressive Dispensationalism.

Critique One weakness to note is that I did not find an actual definition of dispensationalism itself in the beginning of the book. There were several clear definitions of what a dispensation is, but this falls far short of providing a definition of dispensationalism itself.

This may be because he hoped to use the sine qua non to provide his own definition. While that was a beneficial and convincing discussion, however, the book still seemed to lack a concise definition of dispensational theology in the form of a sentence or paragraph similar to his definitions of a dispensation.

By utilizing this title, we automatically, even if only subconsciously, are defining the system by the dispensations, when even Ryrie himself noted that the existence and number of dispensations are not the defining marks of the system. Not only is it an unhelpful title for dispensationalists themselves, but I think it may be unwise to use the term because of the rampant misunderstanding and misuse by non-dispensationalists of which Ryrie speaks in the opening chapter.

I believe defining dispensationalism by the dispensations runs the risk, and indeed, often becomes victim, of failing to recognize the primary distinguishing differences between dispensational and covenant or any other variation of non-dispensational theology.

It seems that the foundational difference between dispensational and covenant theology is one of hermeneutics a point with which I believe Ryrie would fundamentally agree.

While I believe that Ryrie would, fundamentally, agree with this, he seemed to continue to emphasize the dispensations and various arbitrary differences between dispensational and non-dispensational theologians.

Again, I believe Ryrie would largely agree with this. Again, overall, I believe Dispensationalism is a worthy and helpful book. Having carefully read the book in its entirety for the first time, I found this work to have greatly benefited me in my understanding of traditional dispensational views.For example, whereas the notes of the original Scofield Reference Bible on ‘Grace’ contrast the dispensation of grace with that of law by declaring, ‘The point of testing is no longer legal obedience as the condition of salvation, Dispensationalism and the Fragmentation of Millenarianism.

by Dr. Charles C. Ryrie There is no more primary problem in the whole matter of dispensationalism than that of definition. By this is meant not simply arriving at a single sentence definition of the word but definition in its notes and has made it a prime target for attack by nondispensationalists.

Dispensationalism is an approach to theology and the Bible that is based on dividing history into “dispensations” or “economies,” which are seen as different phases of God’s progressive revelation.

Notes on dispensationalism

Dispensationalism. K likes. Dispensationalism stands for Christ, an inerrant Scripture interpreted by a normal hermeneutic, salvation by grace through.

The Doctrine of Progressive Dispensationalism By Todd Baker Th.M. Today there is a growing movement within dispensational theology that is gaining influence among some leading dispensational seminaries and churches across the land.

Dispensationalism. K likes. Dispensationalism stands for Christ, an inerrant Scripture interpreted by a normal hermeneutic, salvation by grace through.